Nanex Logo
Reg NMS Has Been Rescinded!
HFT no longer bound by Trade Through Rules

Back to Main Research Page

Update (May 21, 2014)

The SEC actually rubber-stamped Nasdaq's proposal (below) which, for all practical purposes, destroys the core concept that holds Reg NMS together - but only for the Nasdaq exchange. It's interesting that other exchanges have not made this proposal (that we can find). We strongly recommend the New York Attorney General or Congress investigate, namely:
  • Why did the SEC rubber-stamp Nasdaq's proposal?
  • Have other exchanges made similar proposals? If not, are they still using the SIP?
  • Shouldn't there have been a more public discussion about a proposal that basically destroys Reg NMS, the NBBO, trade-through price protection and any hope of an accurate audit trail?

Update (October 28, 2011)

Take a look at Nasdaq's new proposal. Particularly this section:
\5\ The Exchange is also changing its policies and procedures under Regulation NMS governing the data feeds used by its execution system and routing engine. Current policies state that those systems use data provided by the network processors. In the future, those systems will use data provided either by the network processors or by proprietary feeds offered by certain exchanges directly to vendors.

The exchanges are NOT currently using data provided by the network processors (SIP). Exchanges have been using data from proprietary (direct connect) feeds to other exchanges for their execution systems and routing engines at least since the flash crash. There are events every day that prove this is the case, such as the one below. Other evidence can be found in events such as when quotes get delayed, sometimes for minutes, yet trades occur as if there were no delay. Essentially, this behavior, and the proposal, breaks the trade-through price protection feature of Reg NMS.

In other words, what the exchange is proposing, is already common practice. If exchanges are granted this proposal, Reg NMS, for all practical purposes, is no longer relevant, and there is no point in having the SIP calculate the NBBO, because it will have no meaning.

If the proposal is not granted, will the exchanges finally start using data provided by the network processor? Or will it be business as usual?

On October 7, 2011 beginning at 12:03:39.950, a massive surge of quotes in SPY, IWM, DIA and other market index ETFs, along with many symbols in the Dow Jones Industrial Average, caused an overload in CQS that lasted several seconds. This, in spite of a 25% increase in CQS capacity just 3 days earlier to a whopping 1.25 million quotes/second. During this event, Nasdaq quotes into CQS became delayed at least 800 milliseconds (800,000 microseconds). Other exchange quotes feeding into CQS also became delayed.

We found many symbols with trade executions that appeared several hundred milliseconds before the quotes that could have produced them. How does one ensure trade-through price protection if the price being protected hasn't even occurred yet?

Given the evidence from this event, we have to conclude that Reg NMS must have been secretly rescinded: at least the part that talks about trade through price protection, the NBBO (why is it still being computed?), and the importance of keeping the feed affordable.

From the data we have looked at so far, we estimate that CQS capacity needs to be increased to at least 6 million quotes/second in order to avoid becoming overloaded.  This would be the capacity for a normal trading day. The capacity to handle a surprise news event, would of course, need to be much, much, higher. 

To be clear, we are not advocating increasing CQS capacity at all, mostly because all this extra quote traffic is pure non-sense and has no value what-so-ever. It's mostly coming from new HFT, and interactions between HFT algorithms trying to out fool each other. Something that a regulator doing their job would have put a stop to a long time ago.

The next time the market receives a shocking news story, or undergoes unusual stress, the only traders who will have accurate market prices will be those co-located at the exchange. Just like on May 6, 2010.

We think there might be a solution to this madness.

Below is a 5 millisecond interval chart of SPY showing Nasdaq trades (circles) and quotes (shaded vertical lines). The distance between the points labeled A and a is the minimum time that trades came ahead of quotes.

Below is a 5 millisecond interval chart of SPY showing quotes from EDGE (blue) and Nasdaq (black). The distance between the points labeled A and a is the approximate amount that Nasdaq quotes were delayed relative to EDGE.

The chart below shows the quote rate per exchange going into CQS over the same period and interval as the charts above. The bottom panel shows each exchange's quote rate as a percentage of all quotes going into CQS. You can see the wild oscillations in the red line (Nasdaq) correspond to the dribbling of quotes in SPY above (Between 12:03:40.050 and 12:03:40.800).  Around the 12:03:40.800 mark, Nasdaq quotes suddenly surge accounting for more than half of all quotes going into CQS. If you look closely, you will see other exchange quote rates also oscillate at this time in a round-robin fashion.

Below is a close-up of of the chart above, with a few exchanges removed for clarity.

Below is a 5 millisecond interval chart of IWM showing quotes and trades from BATS (purple) and Nasdaq (black). Here, Nasdaq quotes are delayed, but so are the trades.

Below is a 5 millisecond interval chart of IWM showing quotes and trades from ARCA (red) and Nasdaq (black). You can see ARCA trades (red circles) are coming before the quotes (red vertical lines) that executed them.


Publication Date: 10/10/2011

This report and all material shown on this website is published by Nanex, LLC and may not be reproduced, disseminated, or distributed, in part or in whole, by any means, outside of the recipient's organization without express written authorization from Nanex. It is a violation of federal copyright law to reproduce all or part of this publication or its contents by any means. This material does not constitute a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any securities or investments. The opinions expressed herein are based on publicly available information and are considered reliable. However, Nanex makes NO WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS OF ANY SORT with respect to this report. Any person using this material does so solely at their own risk and Nanex and/or its employees shall be under no liability whatsoever in any respect thereof.